There are places you visit for their monuments. There are places you visit for their beauty. And then there are places that make you look at the world around you differently. Herculaneum is one of them.
I first visited the ancient city many years ago, during my Erasmus years in Napoli. I returned on one of my trips with my friend Claire Fontaine, who has accompanied The Grandma on many of her adventures.
That particular visit began at Mount Vesuvius. By the time we came down from the volcano, it was already late afternoon. We decided to visit Herculaneum, assuming that the archaeological site would still be open. It wasn't. We had arrived just as it was closing.
There was no internet, no mobile phone, no online booking system and no way of checking opening hours at the touch of a screen. We simply stood there, rather disappointed, and explained to the man at the entrance that we had come from Barcelona and had no idea whether we would ever have another opportunity to return. He looked at us. Then he let us in. Not officially, not really. He told us that he had to finish closing the site, but that we could spend a few minutes looking from the entrance and take as many photographs as we wanted. We had film cameras with us, and after a long day at Vesuvius we had almost forgotten that we were carrying them. So we did something very different from what we would do today. We simply looked. We stood there and looked at Herculaneum. And I still remember that view. I can close my eyes even now and see the ancient city spread out below us.
From that elevated position, something caught our attention. The streets. We could identify the two fundamental directions of Roman urban planning: the cardines, running across the city, and the decumani, running in the other direction. The regularity of the plan was extraordinary.
The Archaeological Park itself describes Herculaneum's urban layout as remarkably regular, with the decumani running parallel to the coastline and the cardines perpendicular to them, defining rectangular residential blocks. We mentioned this to the man who had let us in. He clearly had not expected that observation. And then something even better happened. He asked us: "Are you in a hurry?" We told him that we had until the last Circumvesuviana train. So instead of spending fifteen minutes there, we spent a couple of hours. That evening became one of those encounters that you remember for decades. We talked about Roman cities. About streets. About orientation. About the relationship between public and private space. About how people moved through a city. About why a city is not simply a collection of buildings, but a system designed around the movement and needs of human beings. And, because we were in Napoli, the conversation somehow also included music. There were wonderful sfogliatellas, delicious ice cream and an unforgettable coffee.
It was not the visit we had planned. It was infinitely better.
The man who had been supposed to close the archaeological site had given us something much more valuable than a few extra minutes inside it. He had given us his time. I don't even know whether he is still with us. He must surely be retired by now. But I have never forgotten him. And this post is, in a way, my small tribute to him.
There is another reason why Herculaneum has always fascinated me. I come from Barcelona. And if you live in Barcelona, you live inside one of the most recognisable urban grids in Europe. The Eixample, designed by Ildefons Cerdà in the nineteenth century, was conceived as a rational extension of the city, based on a regular network of streets and blocks. Cerdà's plan was approved in 1859, and the expansion began after Barcelona's medieval walls were finally demolished.
The standard Eixample block measures approximately 133 metres by 133 metres, while the streets were designed to be around 20 metres wide. The famous chamfered corners were another characteristic element of Cerdà's design.
Of course, Herculaneum and Barcelona are not the same thing. They were separated by almost two thousand years. Cerdà did not simply copy a Roman city. But standing in Herculaneum and looking at its streets, it is impossible for someone from Barcelona not to recognise something familiar. The idea that a city can be planned rather than allowed to grow entirely at random. The idea that streets create relationships between buildings. That orientation matters. That movement matters. That public space matters. That the shape of a city influences the lives of the people who inhabit it.
And suddenly the Roman cardo and decumanus stop being archaeological vocabulary. They become something much more immediate. They become urban language. This is perhaps what makes Herculaneum so extraordinary. The archaeological remains do not merely tell us where people lived. They allow us to reconstruct, with remarkable detail, how they lived.
The site preserves residential and commercial areas, workshops, baths, public buildings and houses with gardens and terraces. The Archaeological Park emphasises precisely this extraordinary ability to reconstruct everyday life at a particular moment in the ancient world. And that is what I find most fascinating. Not the ruins themselves. The people who once walked between them. Someone opening a shop in the morning. Someone carrying food home. Children running through a street. Someone going to the baths. Someone meeting a friend. Someone complaining about the heat. Someone falling in love. Someone making plans for the following day.
People who had no idea that almost two thousand years later, someone would stand above their streets and try to imagine them. The city that disappeared Herculaneum, like Pompeii, was overwhelmed by the eruption of Vesuvius in AD 79. But its fate was different. The volcanic material that buried the city preserved an extraordinary amount of organic material and architectural detail, giving archaeologists an exceptional window into Roman daily life. And there is something deeply moving about that. Because preservation is a strange thing. We celebrate it as archaeologists and historians. We marvel at the mosaics, the wooden objects, the houses, the streets and the inscriptions. But behind every preserved object there was once a living person. Every doorway was someone's doorway. Every street was someone's route home. Every house contained somebody's life.
That is why I find it difficult to look at Herculaneum simply as an archaeological site. It was a city. And cities are made of people.
I sometimes wonder what would have happened if that man had simply told us: "Sorry. We're closed." We would have gone away. We would probably have taken the train back to Napoli. And Herculaneum would have remained another archaeological site we had visited. Instead, he opened a door that was already supposed to be closed. He gave two young women from Barcelona a little of his time. And, without knowing it, he gave us a lesson that has stayed with me for decades. About Roman urbanism. About cities. About curiosity. And perhaps, above all, about generosity.
I don't remember his name. But I remember the city he helped us see. And whenever I walk through Barcelona, whenever I cross one of the long streets of the Eixample and look down the regular lines of buildings, I sometimes think about that evening in Herculaneum.
Two cities. Two very different worlds. Two very different moments in history. And between them, an idea that has survived for thousands of years: A city is not only the place where we live. It is the way we organise our lives together. And somewhere in Herculaneum, beneath the streets and houses that Vesuvius buried, there is still the trace of a city that knew that very well.
More information: Herculaneum
manifests itself above all in three things:
the aqueducts, the paved roads,
Dionysius of Halicarnassus
.png)
.jpg)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.jpg)